"A" huge dilemma

-
The upcoming election on the county general plan has really reached the point of ridiculousness. How did we get into this mess in the first place? The general plan update process was started seven years ago with the best of intentions, getting everyone involved so that a consensus could be developed. Instead we've ended up with two competing plans and a divided citizenry.

Even trying to explain the situation makes my head spin. We've got three ways to vote on two plans. Yes, three.

1. Measure A: Voting yes means you want the General Plan Initiative, the "slow growth" plan, to pass.
 
2. Measure B: Voting yes means you want to repeal General Plan Update 4, the "developers" plan which was enacted by the county supervisors several months ago.

3. Measure C: Voting yes means you want to enact General Plan Update 4.

Just so we're clear, Yes on A means yes. Yes on B means no, and yes on C means yes. I think.

You can thank the county supervisors for the confusion. They let it go on the ballot that way. To me, that's reason enough to vote against GPU4, which is their baby.

Measure A actually comes closer to my vision for the county, but its opponents do make a valid point that it may be too rigid.

There are a lot of issues involved here, of course, and I don't have time to get into them all. Let me just say that there are actually elements of both plans that I like, and elements of both I don't like.

One thing is clear: This election has become so divisive that whichever side "wins" a substantial portion of the population is going to feel left out. That is no way to plan for a future that affects everyone.

Thus I am leaning towards voting against both plans. If both plans fail, we will revert to the 1982 plan, which doesn't seem so bad anymore. At least we were able to function under it without treating each other as evil personified. Maybe it would give both sides time to cool off, rethink their rigid positions, recognize that we're all in this together, and start to work together.

Comments

Anonymous said…
First, I love your website...Very entertaining, extremely informative.  My wife and I just got back from 9 days in CA.  We're celebrating our 32nd anniversary and decided the way to do it was take advantage of her business trip to San Francisco.  When she was done, I flew out to join her.  We spent 4 days in Sausalito (Casa Madrona and Inn Above the Tide) doing the tourist thing (Alcatraz, Muir Woods, Wine Country) eating at some good restaurants (Poggio's, Spinnaker).  We then drove down Highway 1 for lunch in Santa Cruz before arriving at the Monterey Beach Resort for 2 nights.  It was there that depression set in...I had been stationed at the Presidio Defense Language Institute in 1973-74 and we last visited in 1984.  Seeing the Wharf and Cannery Row was like getting to see your first true love after 33 years and discovering she's become a fat, ugly prostitute...That's the only way I can think to describe it.  We enjoyed the Monterey Whale Watch (6 humpbacks).  The wharf was NOTHING like it used to be, as you know.  The aquarium was outstanding but all the construction around it detracted greatly from what I remember Monterey best for...a small town atmosphere that was a cultural jewel and exquisite to be living in...We cut our visit short and finished our trip in the Carmel Highlands at the Tickle Pink Inn...just what the doctor ordered.  We drove the 9 miles down to the Bixby Creek Bridge and had lunch at the Rocky Point Restaurant.   I guess all good things must pass, but I kinda wished in a weird way that I didn't see Monterey in it's present state so that I could go on believing it would always be as it once was.  We'll be back, and probably try to base our stay at the Tickle Pink...Anyway, sorry to ramble on, but for some reason, I picked this forum to  get some of these thoughts out...Again, thanks for your website...I visit it frequently and will continue to do so...

Mike
August 16, 2007 at 6:35:00 PM PDT

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Three Political Puzzles

-
Puzzle #1 Who in heck is behind Prop 29? The same measure was on the California ballot the last two elections. Both times it went down in flames and it is expected to fail again. But that's not the weird part. The weird part is that while the NO campaign has been reasonably convincing, there has been no visible campaign supporting it. Not this time nor the first two times. You'd think that after thrice going through the time, effort, and expense of gathering signatures to qualify for the ballot that they'd want to give people a reason to vote yes, but they haven't. So what's the point? Prop 29 is a phantom measure with no visible means of support. Puzzle #2 I can't help but wonder if the abrupt conversion of KGO radio from a news talk station to a sports talk station with an emphasis on betting has some connection to Propositions 26 & 27 which are all about sports gambling. An attempt to drum up interest in sports betting before the election, perhaps? The bi
Read more

Things I've learned

-
At 45 I guess I'm officially at middle age. That means I'll live to be 90. Anyway, it seems like a good time to reflect on some of the things I've learned over the years, listed in no particular order: If you hear or smell anything unusual, find out what it is right away. Meals seem to be more satisfying when potatoes are somehow involved. Cultivate your friendships. Time spent with friends and family is never wasted. (See Tiffany ) The time to buy drain opener is before you need it. Read the owners manual. Don't trust Mapquest. You can never win a political argument. However, in the company of those who have open minds, you can have some very interesting political discussions. Ditto for religion. At the grocery checkout, always put the bread on the conveyor last. This keeps it from getting squished by other items at the bagging end. There’s nothing wrong with sex. When you get onto the freeway, keep plenty of space between you and the car ahead. It makes it much easier
Read more

Oh, Nikki, you're better at math than that.

-
Image
And then there were two. Earlier tonight I watched part of the debate between Republican presidential candidates Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis. DeSantis is a jerk, and I can't take him seriously. Haley, on the other hand is a smart gal, and offers some hope for bringing some level of sanity back to the Republican party. But she often dumbs things down to appeal to the simple-minded (mostly Trumpers), and that drives me nuts. Case on point: Haley promised that if elected she would eliminate the federal gasoline tax to reduce the tax burden on working class Americans. Moderator Dana Bash pointed out that the federal gas tax raises over $50 billion annually and is used build and maintain highways and bridges. She then asked Haley how she would pay for those things without it. Haley responded first by evading the question and talking about taxes in general. But eventually she got back around to the gas tax. She employed a classic Republican talking point saying the states collect the
Read more